The sentinel lymph node spread determines quantitatively melanoma seeding to non-sentinel lymph nodes and survival

Ulmer, Anja and Dietz, Klaus and Werner-Klein, Melanie and Haefner, Hans-Martin and Schulz, Claudia and Renner, Philipp and Weber, Florian and Breuninger, Helmut and Roecken, Martin and Garbe, Claus and Fierlbeck, Gerhard and Klein, Christoph A. (2018) The sentinel lymph node spread determines quantitatively melanoma seeding to non-sentinel lymph nodes and survival. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 91. pp. 1-10. ISSN 0959-8049, 1879-0852

Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)

Abstract

Introduction: Complete lymph node dissection (CLND) after a positive sentinel node (SN) biopsy provides important prognostic information in melanoma patients but has been questioned for therapeutic use recently. We explored whether quantification of the tumour spread to SNs may replace histopathology of non-sentinel nodes (NSNs) for staging purposes. Patients and methods: We quantified melanoma spread in SNs and NSNs in 128 patients undergoing CLND for a positive SN. In addition to routine histopathology, one-half of each of all 1496 SNs and NSNs was disaggregated into a single cell suspension and stained immunocytochemically to determine the number of melanoma cells per 10(6) lymph node cells, i.e. the disseminated cancer cell density (DCCD). Results: We uncovered melanoma spread to NSNs in the majority of patients; however, the tumour load and the proportion of positive nodes were significantly lower in NSNs than in SNs. The relation between SN and NSN spread could be described by a mathematical function with DCCDNSN = DCCDSNc/10(1-c) (c = 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.62-0.76). At a median follow-up of 67 months, multivariable Cox regression analyses revealed that DCCDSN (p = 0.02; HR 1.34, 95% CI: 1.05-1.71) and the total number of pathologically positive nodes (p = 0.02; HR 1.53, 95% CI: 1.07-2.22) were significant risk factors after controlling for age, gender, thickness of melanoma and ulceration status. A prognostic model based on DCCDSN and melanoma thickness predicted outcome as accurately as a model including pathological information of both SNs and NSNs. Conclusion: The assessment of DCCDSN renders CLND for staging purposes unnecessary. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: STAGE-III MELANOMA; AMERICAN JOINT COMMITTEE; POSITIVE MELANOMA; PHASE-3 TRIAL; TUMOR BURDEN; DISSECTION; BIOPSY; METASTASES; SYSTEM; MULTICENTER; Sentinel lymph node biopsy; Lymph node dissection; Malignant melanoma; Lymphatic metastasis; Survival
Subjects: 600 Technology > 610 Medical sciences Medicine
Divisions: Medicine > Lehrstuhl für experimentelle Medizin und Therapieverfahren
Depositing User: Dr. Gernot Deinzer
Date Deposited: 19 Mar 2020 10:20
Last Modified: 19 Mar 2020 10:20
URI: https://pred.uni-regensburg.de/id/eprint/15009

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item