Comparison of Conventional Abdominal CT with MR-Enterography in Patients with Active Crohn's Disease and Acute Abdominal Pain

Schreyer, Andreas G. and Hoffstetter, Patrick and Daneschnejad, Michel and Jung, Ernst-Michael and Pawlik, Michael and Friedrich, Chris and Fellner, Claudia and Strauch, Ulrike and Klebl, Frank and Herfarth, Hans and Zorger, Niels (2010) Comparison of Conventional Abdominal CT with MR-Enterography in Patients with Active Crohn's Disease and Acute Abdominal Pain. ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 17 (3). pp. 352-357. ISSN 1076-6332,

Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)

Abstract

Rationale and Objectives: Patients with known Crohn's disease (CD) and an acute onset of severe abdominal pain attending an emergency room frequently undergo contrast-enhanced emergency computed tomography (CT) for complication assessment. To assess small bowel changes, an additional dedicated imaging procedure such as magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) is regularly performed. Therefore, these patients undergo two imaging procedures, although the clinical and diagnostic value of such an approach is not known. In a retrospective study, we compared the diagnostic value of a conventional abdominal CT with a dedicated small bowel MRE to assess bowel wall changes as well as typical complications in patients with advanced CID. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 53 patients with CD having a conventional abdominal multidetector-CT (MD-CT) and MRE within 2 days. Image quality and bowel inflammation was analyzed for each bowel segment. Lymph nodes, abscesses, and fistulas were evaluated. Results: For small bowel and colon assessment, there was no significant difference for image quality between CT and MRE. Inflammation diagnosis was not significantly different between CT (69.4%) and MRE (71.4%). Colonic inflammation was diagnosed in 30.2% based on CT and 14.3% based on MRE. The difference for the detection of lymph nodes was significant (CT 49; MRE 27), whereas the differences between fistula (CT 25, MIRE 27) or abscesses (CT and MRE 32) detection were not significant. Conclusions: In patients with known advanced CID with acute abdominal pain conventional abdominal MD-CT, which is frequently performed as an emergency imaging procedure, is sufficient for bowel wall assessment. Based on our data, additional dedicated small bowel imaging such as MRE seems not to be necessary.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: INFLAMMATORY-BOWEL-DISEASE; RADIATION-EXPOSURE; FOLLOW-THROUGH; CLINICAL-EXPERIENCE; ENTEROCLYSIS; COLONOGRAPHY; POPULATION; MDCT; IBD; CT; MRI; enterography; IBD
Subjects: 600 Technology > 610 Medical sciences Medicine
Divisions: Medicine > Lehrstuhl für Anästhesiologie
Medicine > Lehrstuhl für Innere Medizin I
Medicine > Lehrstuhl für Röntgendiagnostik
Depositing User: Dr. Gernot Deinzer
Date Deposited: 03 Aug 2020 12:01
Last Modified: 03 Aug 2020 12:01
URI: https://pred.uni-regensburg.de/id/eprint/24990

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item