Prognostic Factors of Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma: Results From a Multi-Institutional Series After Pathological Review

Herrmann, Edwin and Trojan, Lutz and Becker, Frank and Wuelfing, Christian and Schrader, Andres J. and Barth, Peter and Stoeckle, Michael and Hammerschmied, Christine G. and Staehler, Michael and Stief, Christian and Haferkamp, Axel and Hohenfellner, Markus and Legal, Wolfgang and Wullich, Bernd and Bolenz, Christian and Klein, Tobias and Noldus, Joachim and Bierer, Stefan and Hertle, Lothar and Brenner, Walpurgis and Roos, Frederik and Michel, Maurice S. and Walter, Bernhard and Wieland, Wolf and Gerss, Joachim and Otto, Wolfgang and Hartmann, Arndt (2010) Prognostic Factors of Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma: Results From a Multi-Institutional Series After Pathological Review. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 183 (2). pp. 460-466. ISSN 0022-5347,

Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)

Abstract

Purpose: We examined papillary renal cell carcinoma prognostic variables and validated the 2002 UICC TNM staging system in a multicenter analysis. Materials and Methods: From 10 urological institutions in Germany followup data were collected on a total of 675 patients with papillary renal cell carcinoma. Central pathological review was done to validate external histopathological diagnoses. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to derive cumulative cancer specific and overall survival, and the log rank test was used to compare the curves of 2 or more groups. For multivariate analysis of prognostic factors Cox regression analysis was done. All proportional hazard assumptions were systemically verified using the Grambsch-Therneau test. Results: Cancer specific survival was significantly related to TNM stage and histological grading on univariate and multivariate analyses. Five-year cancer specific survival in pT1b cases was significantly shorter than in pT1a cases (90.0% vs 98.3%, p = 0.017). No significant difference was found between pT1b and pT2 tumors. Patients with pT3 or greater disease were at high risk for metastasis (50.6%) while metastatic disease associated with pT2 or less tumors occurred in 7.8% (p < 0.0001). After metastatic disease was present the prognosis was poor with 7.2% 5-year cancer specific survival. Age was associated with poor prognosis in the subgroup with pT3 or greater tumors on univariate analysis (p = 0.026) but not on multivariate analysis. Conclusions: In its current form the 2002 UICC TNM staging system is not applicable to papillary renal cell carcinoma. Clinical and radiological followup should be offered at frequent intervals to patients with venous thrombus and/or locally advanced disease. The role of age remains unclear but should not be underestimated in risk stratification after surgery.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: HISTOLOGIC SUBTYPES; RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY; STAGING SYSTEM; SURVIVAL; CLASSIFICATION; VALIDATION; RECURRENCE; PREDICTION; NOMOGRAM; FEATURES; kidney; carcinoma, renal cell; risk; neoplasm metastasis; neoplasm staging
Subjects: 600 Technology > 610 Medical sciences Medicine
Divisions: Medicine > Lehrstuhl für Urologie
Depositing User: Dr. Gernot Deinzer
Date Deposited: 10 Aug 2020 06:46
Last Modified: 10 Aug 2020 06:46
URI: https://pred.uni-regensburg.de/id/eprint/25232

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item