Piloting an ICU follow-up clinic to improve health-related quality of life in ICU survivors after a prolonged intensive care stay (PINA): feasibility of a pragmatic randomised controlled trial

Drewitz, Karl Philipp and Hasenpusch, Claudia and Bernardi, Christine and Brandstetter, Susanne and Fisser, Christoph and Pielmeier, Katharina and Rohr, Magdalena and Brunnthaler, Vreni and Schmidt, Konrad and Malfertheiner, Maximilian V. and Apfelbacher, Christian J. (2023) Piloting an ICU follow-up clinic to improve health-related quality of life in ICU survivors after a prolonged intensive care stay (PINA): feasibility of a pragmatic randomised controlled trial. BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 23 (1): 344. ISSN 1471-2253,

Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)

Abstract

BackgroundICU survivors often suffer from prolonged physical and mental impairments resulting in the so called "Post-Intensive Care Syndrome" (PICS). The aftercare of former ICU patients affected by PICS in particular has not been addressed sufficiently in Germany so far. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of a pragmatic randomised trial (RCT) comparing an intensive care unit (ICU) follow-up clinic intervention to usual care.MethodsThis pilot study in a German university hospital evaluated the feasibility of a pragmatic RCT. Patients were assigned in a 1:1 ratio to an ICU follow-up clinic intervention or to usual care. The concept of this follow-up clinic was previously developed in a participatory process with patients, next of kin, health care professionals and researchers. We performed a process evaluation and determined acceptability, fidelity, completeness of measurement instruments and practicality as feasibility outcomes. The RCT's primary outcome (health-related quality of life) was assessed six months after ICU discharge by means of the physical component scale of the Short-Form-12 self-report questionnaire.ResultsThe pilot study was conducted from June 2020 to May 2021 with 21 and 20 participants in the intervention and control group. Principal findings related to feasibility were 85% consent rate (N = 48), 62% fidelity rate, 34% attrition rate (N = 41) and 77% completeness of outcome measurements. The primary effectiveness outcome (health-related quality of life) could be measured in 93% of participants who completed the study (N = 27). The majority of participants (85%) needed assistance with follow-up questionnaires (practicality). Median length of ICU stay was 13 days and 85% (N = 41) received mechanical ventilation, median Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score was nine. Six-month follow-up assessment was planned for all study participants and performed for 66% (N = 41) of the participants after 197 days (median).ConclusionThe participatory developed intervention of an ICU follow-up clinic and the pragmatic pilot RCT both seem to be feasible. We recommend to start a pragmatic RCT on the effectiveness of the ICU follow-up clinic.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov US NLM, NCT04186468, Submission: 02/12/2019, Registration: 04/12/2019, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04186468

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: POSTTRAUMATIC-STRESS-DISORDER; CRITICAL ILLNESS; PHYSICAL CAPABILITY; REHABILITATION; INTERVENTIONS; DESIGN; DETERMINANTS; DISCHARGE; MORTALITY; SEVERITY; Complex intervention; Critical care; ICU follow-up clinic; Mechanical ventilation; Pilot study; Post-intensive care syndrome (PICS)
Subjects: 600 Technology > 610 Medical sciences Medicine
Divisions: Medicine > Lehrstuhl für Innere Medizin II
Medicine > Lehrstuhl für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin
Medicine > Institut für Epidemiologie und Präventivmedizin > Medical Sociology
Depositing User: Dr. Gernot Deinzer
Date Deposited: 13 Mar 2024 13:13
Last Modified: 13 Mar 2024 13:14
URI: https://pred.uni-regensburg.de/id/eprint/59938

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item