Influence of Component Rotation in Total Knee Arthroplasty on Tibiofemoral Kinematics-A Cadaveric Investigation

Maderbacher, Guenther and Keshmiri, Armin and Springorum, Hans R. and Maderbacher, Hermann and Grifka, Joachim and Baier, Clemens (2017) Influence of Component Rotation in Total Knee Arthroplasty on Tibiofemoral Kinematics-A Cadaveric Investigation. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 32 (9). pp. 2869-2877. ISSN 0883-5403, 1532-8406

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Background: Physiological tibiofemoral kinematics have been shown to be important for good knee function after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of the present study was to investigate the influence of component rotation on tibiofemoral kinematics during knee flexion. We asked which axial component alignment best reconstructs physiological tibiofemoral kinematics and which combinations should be avoided. Methods: Ten healthy cadaveric knees were examined. By means of a navigational device, tibiofemoral kinematics between 0 degrees and 90 degrees of flexion were assessed before and after TKA using the following different rotational component alignment: femoral components: ligament balanced, 6 degrees internal, 3 degrees external rotation, and 6 degrees external rotation in relation to the posterior condylar line; tibial components: self-adapted, 6 degrees internal rotation, and 6 degrees external rotation. Results: Physiological tibiofemoral kinematics could be partly reconstructed by TKA. Ligament-balanced femoral rotation and 6 degrees femoral external rotation both in combination with 6 degrees tibial component external rotation, and 3 degrees femoral external rotation in combination with 6 degrees tibial component internal rotation or self-aligning tibial component were able to restore tibial longitudinal rotation. Largest kinematical differences were found for the combination femoral component internal and tibial component external rotations. Conclusion: From a kinematic-based view, surgeons should avoid internal rotation of femoral components. However, even often recommended combinations of rotational component alignment (3 degrees femoral external and tibial external rotation) significantly change tibiofemoral kinematics. Self-aligning tibial components solely restored tibiofemoral kinematics with the combination of 3 degrees femoral component of external rotation. For the future, navigational devices might help to axially align components to restore patient-specific and natural tibiofemoral kinematics. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: IN-VIVO; NAVIGATION SYSTEM; REGISTRATION PROCESS; PATELLAR KINEMATICS; WEIGHT-BEARING; ALIGNMENT; JOINT; FLEXION; REPLACEMENT; MOVEMENT; TKA; kinematics; knee; roll back; component alignment; rotational alignment
Subjects: 600 Technology > 610 Medical sciences Medicine
Divisions: Medicine > Lehrstuhl für Orthopädie
Depositing User: Dr. Gernot Deinzer
Date Deposited: 14 Dec 2018 13:15
Last Modified: 28 Feb 2019 14:06
URI: https://pred.uni-regensburg.de/id/eprint/1314

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item