OSAKA Trial: A Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing Tacrolimus QD and BD in Kidney Transplantation

Albano, Laetitia and Banas, Bernhard and Klempnauer, Juergen L. and Glyda, Maciej and Viklicky, Ondrej and Kamar, Nassim (2013) OSAKA Trial: A Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing Tacrolimus QD and BD in Kidney Transplantation. TRANSPLANTATION, 96 (10). pp. 897-903. ISSN 0041-1337, 1534-6080

Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)

Abstract

Background. The once-daily (QD), prolonged-release formulation of tacrolimus has been shown to improve adherence versus twice-daily (BD) tacrolimus. Treatment nonadherence in transplant recipients has been associated with poor graft outcomes. Methods. This open-label, parallel-group study randomized adults with end-stage renal disease undergoing primary kidney transplantation or retransplantation to an initial dose of tacrolimus BD 0.2 mg/kg per day (Arm 1; n=309), QD 0.2 mg/kg per day (Arm 2; n=302), QD 0.3 mg/kg per day (Arm 3; n=304) all with mycophenolate mofetil and corticosteroids (tapered) over 24 weeks, or tacrolimus QD 0.2 mg/kg per day with mycophenolate mofetil, basiliximab, and corticosteroids given only perioperatively (Arm 4; n=283). The primary composite endpoint (efficacy failure; per protocol set) was defined as graft loss, biopsy-confirmed acute rejection, or graft dysfunction at week 24. Graft dysfunction was defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate Modification of Diet in Renal Disease-4 formula of less than 40 mL/min/1.73 m(2). The prespecified noninferiority margin was 12.5%. Results. The per protocol set included 976 patients: 237, 263, 246, and 230 patients in Arms 1 to 4, respectively. Noninferiority of the composite endpoint was demonstrated for Arm 2 versus Arm 1; Kaplan-Meier estimates of efficacy failure were 42.2% and 40.6%, respectively (difference, -1.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -12.2% to 9.0%). Noninferiority to Arm 1 was not confirmed for Arm 3 (difference, -3.5%; 95% CI, -13.6% to 6.6%) or Arm 4 (difference, -7.1%; 95% CI, -16.1% to 1.9%). Graft dysfunction (estimated glomerular filtration rate <40 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) was the main determinant of composite-endpoint efficacy failure across all arms. Conclusions. In patients representative of the European kidney transplant population, tacrolimus QD-based immunosuppression (0.2 mg/kg/day), without induction, showed similar efficacy to 0.2 mg/kg per day tacrolimus BD.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: ONCE-DAILY TACROLIMUS; RENAL-TRANSPLANTATION; CALCINEURIN INHIBITORS; PHASE-III; RECIPIENTS; IMMUNOSUPPRESSION; ADHERENCE; VARIABILITY; FORMULATION; REGIMENS; Tacrolimus; Kidney transplantation; Extended-criteria donor; Composite endpoint for graft failure
Subjects: 600 Technology > 610 Medical sciences Medicine
Divisions: Medicine > Lehrstuhl für Innere Medizin II
Depositing User: Dr. Gernot Deinzer
Date Deposited: 26 Mar 2020 07:02
Last Modified: 26 Mar 2020 07:02
URI: https://pred.uni-regensburg.de/id/eprint/15649

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item