Lent, V. and Smentkowski, U. and Weber, B. and Brummeisl, W. (2013) Medical Reviews of Claims for Damages and Errors in Urology. AKTUELLE UROLOGIE, 44 (5). pp. 383-395. ISSN 0001-7868, 1438-8820
Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)Abstract
In liability law, a medical review is considered to be an expert opinion that is provided at the request of those involved (patient or physician) of a course of treatment. It must be carried out according to defined criteria with the aim of providing a plausible basis for arbitration. This is achieved by means of an objective determination of the facts, a reasonable assessment of the error(s) and (where appropriate) a realistic description of the injury involved. The following fields should be covered in a concise review: conditions and procedures applied to the review, criteria to be used in the review, types of error that are possible during the treatment, assessment of the treatment errors committed, possible treatment errors that can occur in urology, conclusions to be drawn from the review. In summary, a medical assessment carried out in the course of claims for damages should provide a balanced assessment that takes into account the confidential relationship between the physician and patient. This means that the review procedure must be performed under the best possible conditions for professional standards and care [2].
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | ; treatment error; medical review; liability law |
| Subjects: | 600 Technology > 610 Medical sciences Medicine |
| Divisions: | Medicine > Lehrstuhl für Urologie |
| Depositing User: | Dr. Gernot Deinzer |
| Date Deposited: | 31 Mar 2020 14:05 |
| Last Modified: | 31 Mar 2020 14:05 |
| URI: | https://pred.uni-regensburg.de/id/eprint/16073 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
