On the differences between mega- and meta-imputation and analysis exemplified on the genetics of age-related macular degeneration

Gorski, Mathias and Guenther, Felix and Winkler, Thomas W. and Weber, Bernhard H. F. and Heid, Iris M. (2019) On the differences between mega- and meta-imputation and analysis exemplified on the genetics of age-related macular degeneration. GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 43 (5). pp. 559-576. ISSN 0741-0395, 1098-2272

Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)

Abstract

While current genome-wide association analyses often rely on meta-analysis of study-specific summary statistics, individual participant data (IPD) from multiple studies increase options for modeling. When multistudy IPD is available, however, it is unclear whether this data is to be imputed and modeled across all participants (mega-imputation and mega-analysis) or study-specifically (meta-imputation and meta-analysis). Here, we investigated different approaches toward imputation and analysis using 52,189 subjects from 25 studies of the International Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD) Genomics Consortium including, 16,144 AMD cases and 17,832 controls for association analysis. From 27,448,454 genetic variants after 1,000-Genomes-based imputation, mega-imputation yielded similar to 400,000 more variants with high imputation quality (mostly rare variants) compared to meta-imputation. For AMD signal detection (P < 5 x 10(-8)) in mega-imputed data, most loci were detected with mega-analysis without adjusting for study membership (40 loci, including 34 known); we considered these loci genuine, since genetic effects and P-values were comparable across analyses. In meta-imputed data, we found 31 additional signals, mostly near chromosome tails or reference panel gaps, which disappeared after accounting for interaction of whole-genome amplification (WGA) with study membership or after excluding studies with WGA-participants. For signal detection with multistudy IPD, we recommend mega-imputation and mega-analysis, with meta-imputation followed by meta-analysis being a computationally appealing alternative.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION; METAANALYSIS; VISUALIZATION; EFFICIENCY; age-related macular degeneration; genome-wide association studies; Genotype-imputation; mega-analysis; meta-analysis
Subjects: 600 Technology > 610 Medical sciences Medicine
Divisions: Medicine > Institut für Epidemiologie und Präventivmedizin
Medicine > Institut für Epidemiologie und Präventivmedizin > Lehrstuhl für Genetische Epidemiologie
Depositing User: Dr. Gernot Deinzer
Date Deposited: 06 Apr 2020 11:21
Last Modified: 06 Apr 2020 11:21
URI: https://pred.uni-regensburg.de/id/eprint/26744

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item