Increasing intensity of therapies assigned at diagnosis does not improve survival of adults with acute myeloid leukemia

Krug, U. and Berdel, W. E. and Gale, R. P. and Haferlach, C. and Schnittger, S. and Mueller-Tidow, C. and Braess, J. and Spiekermann, K. and Staib, P. and Beelen, D. and Serve, H. and Schliemann, C. and Stelljes, M. and Balleisen, L. and Maschmeyer, G. and Grueneisen, A. and Eimermacher, H. and Giagounidis, A. and Rasche, H. and Hehlmann, R. and Lengfelder, E. and Thiel, E. and Reichle, A. and Aul, C. and Ludwig, W-D and Kern, W. and Haferlach, T. and Koepcke, W. and Goerlich, D. and Sauerland, M. C. and Heinecke, A. and Woermann, B. J. and Hiddemann, W. and Buechner, T. (2016) Increasing intensity of therapies assigned at diagnosis does not improve survival of adults with acute myeloid leukemia. LEUKEMIA, 30 (6). pp. 1230-1236. ISSN 0887-6924, 1476-5551

Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)

Abstract

We randomized 3375 adults with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome to test whether increasingly intensive chemotherapies assigned at study-entry and analyzed on an intent-to-treat basis improved outcomes. In total, 1529 subjects <60 years were randomized to receive: (1) a first course of induction therapy with high-dose cytarabine and mitoxantrone (HAM) or with standard-dose cytarabine, daunorubicin and 6-thioguanine (TAD) followed by a second course of HAM; (2) granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) or no G-CSF before induction and consolidation courses; and (3) high-dose therapy and an autotransplant or maintenance chemotherapy. In total, 1846 subjects. 60 years were randomized to receive: (1) a first induction course of HAM or TAD and second induction course of HAM (if they had bone marrow blasts >= 5% after the first course); and (2) G-CSF or no G-CSF as above. Median follow-up was 7.4 years (range, 1 day to 14.7 years). Five-year event-free survivals (EFSs) for subjects receiving a first induction course of HAM vs TAD were 17% (95% confidence interval, 15, 18%) vs 16% (95% confidence interval 14, 18%; P = 0.719). Five-year EFSs for subjects randomized to receive or not receive G-CSF were 19% (95% confidence interval 16, 21%) vs 16% (95% confidence interval 14, 19%; P = 0.266). Five-year relapse-free survivals (RFSs) for subjects <60 years receiving an autotransplant vs maintenance therapy were 43% (95% confidence interval 40, 47%) vs 40 (95% confidence interval 35, 44%; P = 0.535). Many subjects never achieved pre-specified landmarks and consequently did not receive their assigned therapies. These data indicate the limited impact of more intensive therapies on outcomes of adults with AML. Moreover, none of the more intensive therapies we tested improved 5-year EFS, RFS or any other outcomes.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: BONE-MARROW-TRANSPLANTATION; STEM-CELL TRANSPLANTATION; ACUTE MYELOGENOUS LEUKEMIA; COLONY-STIMULATING FACTOR; HIGH-DOSE CYTARABINE; 1ST REMISSION; POSTREMISSION THERAPY; CHEMOTHERAPY; TRIAL; RECOMMENDATIONS;
Subjects: 600 Technology > 610 Medical sciences Medicine
Divisions: Medicine > Lehrstuhl für Innere Medizin III (Hämatologie und Internistische Onkologie)
Depositing User: Dr. Gernot Deinzer
Date Deposited: 25 Mar 2019 13:03
Last Modified: 25 Mar 2019 13:03
URI: https://pred.uni-regensburg.de/id/eprint/2864

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item