Comparison perception of singular transcranial magnetic stimuli by subjectively electrosensitive subjects and general population controls

Frick, Ulrich and Kharraz, Alexander and Hauser, Simone and Wiegand, R. and Rehm, J. and von Kovatsits, Ulla and Eichhammer, Peter (2005) Comparison perception of singular transcranial magnetic stimuli by subjectively electrosensitive subjects and general population controls. BIOELECTROMAGNETICS, 26 (4). pp. 287-298. ISSN 0197-8462,

Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)

Abstract

Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex by single pulses of varying field intensities was used to measure thresholds of individual perception and motor response in three groups of subjects: subjectively electrosensitive people, general population controls with a high burden of complaints related to electromagnetic field (EMF) exposure in the literature (highest decile in complaint burden), and general population controls with a low burden of complaints (lowest decile in complaint burden). The major study endpoint was the ability of the subjects to differentiate between real magnetic stimulation and a sham condition. There were no significant differences between groups in the thresholds, neither of detecting the real magnetic stimulus nor in motor response. But the three groups differed significantly in differentiating between stimulation and sham condition, with the subjectively electrosensitive people having the lowest ability to differentiate and the control group with high level of EMF-related complaints having the best ability to differentiate. Differences between groups were mostly due to false alarm reactions in the sham condition reported by subjectively electrosensitives (SES). We found no objective correlate of the self perception of being ''electrosensitive." Overall, our experiment does not support the hypothesis that subjectively electrosensitive patients suffer from a physiological hypersensitivity to EMFs or stimuli. Further research should focus on disposing factors explaining the unspecific sensory hyperresponsiveness of subjectively electrosensitive subjects. (c) 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: PERCEIVED ELECTRICAL HYPERSENSITIVITY; ELECTROMAGNETIC-FIELD SENSITIVITY; SELF-REPORTED HYPERSENSITIVITY; 50 HZ; CELLULAR TELEPHONES; MOBILE PHONES; EXPOSURE; PROVOCATION; SLEEP; SUSCEPTIBILITY; subjective hypersensitivity; perception threshold; motor threshold; TMS; electromagnetic complaints
Subjects: 100 Philosophy & psychology > 150 Psychology
600 Technology > 610 Medical sciences Medicine
Divisions: Medicine > Lehrstuhl für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie
Human Sciences > Institut für Psychologie
Depositing User: Dr. Gernot Deinzer
Date Deposited: 14 May 2021 06:30
Last Modified: 14 May 2021 06:30
URI: https://pred.uni-regensburg.de/id/eprint/36154

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item