Clinically relevant improvement of recurrence-free survival with 5-aminolevulinic acid induced fluorescence diagnosis in patients with superficial bladder tumors

Filbeck, Thomas and Pichlmeier, Uwe and Knuechel, Ruth and Wieland, Wolf F. and Roessler, Wolfgang (2002) Clinically relevant improvement of recurrence-free survival with 5-aminolevulinic acid induced fluorescence diagnosis in patients with superficial bladder tumors. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 168 (1): UNSP 0022-. pp. 67-71. ISSN 0022-5347

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Purposes: Fluorescence diagnosis induced by 5-aminolevulinic acid enables more thorough transurethral resection of superficial bladder carcinoma compared with conventional white light. We performed a prospective, single institution, randomized trial to investigate whether the residual tumor rate and long-term tumor recurrence can be decreased by fluorescence diagnosis. Materials and Methods: A total of 301 patients underwent transurethral resection of bladder tumors with white light or fluorescence diagnosis. Transurethral resection was repeated 5 to 6 weeks later to evaluate the residual tumor rate. To determine recurrence-free survival patient followup was performed every 3 months by white light cystoscopy and urine cytology. Recurrence-free survival was analyzed via Kaplan-Meier methods and multivariable Cox regression analysis. Results: A total of 191 patients with superficial bladder carcinoma were available for efficacy analysis. The residual tumor rate was 25.2% in the white light arm versus 4.5% in the fluorescence diagnosis arm (p < 0.0001). Median followup in the white light arm in 103 cases was 21.2 months (range 4 to 40) compared with 20.5 (range 3 to 40) in the 88 in the fluorescence diagnosis arm. Recurrence-free survival in the fluorescence diagnosis group was 89.6% after 12 and 24 months compared with 73.8% and 65.9%, respectively, in the white light group (p = 0.004). This superiority proved to be independent of risk group. The adjusted hazard ratio of fluorescence diagnosis versus white light transurethral resection was 0.33 (95% confidence interval 0.16 to 0.67). Conclusions: Fluorescence diagnosis is significantly superior to conventional white light transurethral resection with respect to the residual tumor rate and recurrence-free survival. The differences in recurrence-free survival imply that fluorescence diagnosis is a clinically relevant procedure for decreasing the number of tumor recurrences.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: TRANSITIONAL-CELL-CARCINOMA; TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION; INTRAVESICAL INSTILLATION; CANCER; bladder; bladder neoplasms; aminolevulinic acid; fluorescence; diagnosis
Subjects: 600 Technology > 610 Medical sciences Medicine
Divisions: Medicine > Lehrstuhl für Pathologie
Depositing User: Dr. Gernot Deinzer
Date Deposited: 19 Oct 2021 05:28
Last Modified: 19 Oct 2021 05:28
URI: https://pred.uni-regensburg.de/id/eprint/40129

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item