Bushuven, Stefan and Dettenkofer, Markus and Sippel, Sonia and Koenig, Sarah and Bushuven, Stefanie and Schneider-Brachert, Wulf (2020) Speaking up behavior and cognitive bias in hand hygiene: Competences of German-speaking medical students. PLOS ONE, 15 (9): e0239444. ISSN 1932-6203,
Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)Abstract
Introduction Infection prevention and speaking up on errors are core qualities of health care providers. Heuristic effects (e.g. overconfidence) may impair behavior in daily routine, while speaking up can be inhibited by hierarchical barriers and medical team factors. Aim of this investigation was to determine, how medical students experience these difficulties for hand hygiene in daily routine. Methods On the base of prior investigations we developed a questionnaire with 5-point Likert ordinal scaled items and free text entries. This was tested for validity and reliability (Cronbach's Alpha 0.89). Accredited German, Swiss and Austrian universities were contacted and medical students asked to participated in the anonymous online survey. Quantitative statistics used parametric and non-parametric tests and effect size calculations according to Lakens. Qualitative data was coded according to Janesick. Results 1042 undergraduates of 12 universities participated. All rated their capabilities in hand hygiene and feedback reception higher than those of fellow students, nurses and physicians (p<0.001). Half of the participants rating themselves to be best educated, realized that faulty hand hygiene can be of lethal effect. Findings were independent from age, sex, academic course and university. Speaking-up in case of omitted hand hygiene was rated to be done seldomly and most rare on persons of higher hierarchic levels. Qualitative results of 164 entries showed four main themes: 1) Education methods in hand hygiene are insufficient, 2) Hierarchy barriers impair constructive work place culture 3) Hygiene and feedback are linked to medical ethics and 4) There is no consequence for breaking hygiene rules. Discussion Although partially limited by the selection bias, this study confirms the overconfidence-effects demonstrated in post-graduates in other settings and different professions. The independence from study progress suggests, that the effect occurs before start of the academic course with need for educational intervention at the very beginning. Qualitative data showed that used methods are insufficient and contradictory work place behavior in hospitals are frustrating. Even 20 years after "To err is human", work place culture still is far away from the desirable.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | PATIENT SAFETY; HEALTH-CARE; FEEDBACK; OVERCONFIDENCE; DOCTORS; ERRORS; |
| Subjects: | 600 Technology > 610 Medical sciences Medicine |
| Divisions: | Medicine > Lehrstuhl für Medizinische Mikrobiologie und Hygiene |
| Depositing User: | Dr. Gernot Deinzer |
| Date Deposited: | 11 Mar 2021 08:10 |
| Last Modified: | 11 Mar 2021 08:10 |
| URI: | https://pred.uni-regensburg.de/id/eprint/43747 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
