Final results of the PraVAC trial: prevention of wound complications following inguinal lymph node dissection in patients with penile cancer using epidermal vacuum-assisted wound closure

Schmid, Sebastian C. and Seitz, Anna K. and Haller, Bernhard and Fritsche, Hans-Martin and Huber, Toni and Burger, Maximilian and Gschwend, Juergen E. and Maurer, Tobias (2021) Final results of the PraVAC trial: prevention of wound complications following inguinal lymph node dissection in patients with penile cancer using epidermal vacuum-assisted wound closure. WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 39. pp. 613-620. ISSN 0724-4983, 1433-8726

Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)

Abstract

Purpose Inguinal lymphadenectomy in penile cancer is associated with a high rate of wound complications. The aim of this trial was to prospectively analyze the effect of an epidermal vacuum wound dressing on lymphorrhea, complications and reintervention in patients with inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile cancer. Patients and methods Prospective, multicenter, randomized, investigator-initiated study in two German university hospitals (2013-2017). Thirty-one patients with penile cancer and indication for bilateral inguinal lymph node dissection were included and randomized to conventional wound care on one side (CONV) versus epidermal vacuum wound dressing (VAC) on the other side. Results A smaller cumulative drainage fluid volume until day 14 (CDF) compared to contralateral side was observed in 15 patients (CONV) vs. 16 patients (VAC), with a median CDF 230 ml (CONV) vs. 415 ml (VAC) and a median maximum daily fluid volume (MDFV) of 80 ml (CONV) vs. 110 ml (VAC). Median time of indwelling drainage: 7 days (CONV) vs. 8 days (VAC). All grade surgery-related complications were seen in 74% patients (CONV) vs. 74% patients (VAC); grade 3 complications in 3 patients (CONV) vs. 6 patients (VAC). Prolonged hospital stay occurred in 32% patients (CONV) vs. 48% patients (VAC); median hospital stay was 11.5 days. Reintervention due to complications occurred in 45% patients (CONV) vs. 42% patients (VAC). Conclusions In this prospective, randomized trial we could not observe a significant difference between epidermal vacuum treatment and conventional wound care.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; LYMPHADENECTOMY; BIOPSY; MANAGEMENT; MORBIDITY; Inguinal surgery; Penile cancer; Lymphorrhea; PraeVac; Closed incision negative pressure
Subjects: 600 Technology > 610 Medical sciences Medicine
Divisions: Medicine > Lehrstuhl für Urologie
Depositing User: Petra Gürster
Date Deposited: 09 Apr 2021 08:59
Last Modified: 09 Apr 2021 08:59
URI: https://pred.uni-regensburg.de/id/eprint/44601

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item