Gossler, Christopher and Hillinger, Johannes and Burger, Maximilian and Brundl, Johannes and Denzinger, Stefan and Gierth, Michael and Breyer, Johannes (2021) Epidemiology and therapy of symptomatic lymphoceles after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 10 (2). pp. 821-829. ISSN 2223-4683, 2223-4691
Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)Abstract
Background: Lymphoceles are a common postoperative complication after radical prostatectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy. Therapeutic options include cannulation and drainage (CD), drainage and instillation (DI), or laparoscopic fenestration (LF). The aim of this study was to investigate the epidemiology of symptomatic lymphoceles (SLC) and evaluate the treatment options. Methods: We retrospectively analysed all patients who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) at our clinic from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2018. All documented lymphoceles of these patients were recorded and analysed with regard to symptoms, possible infection and the treatment option (or options) chosen. Results: We were able to include all 1,029 patients who underwent RARP in the aforementioned period of time. Of these, 18.1% were diagnosed with a lymphocele either when discharged or when readmitted and 6.9% experienced an SLC requiring treatment. Thirteen-point-seven percent of patients readmitted with SLC showed an accompanying thrombosis. Due to recurring or bilateral SLCs receiving different treatment options for each side, there was a total of 115 SLCs treated. CD was carried out in 102 cases. Twenty-point six percent of patients were sufficiently treated this way, the rest required further treatment or experienced recurrences not requiring further treatment. DI was carried out in 56 cases. Of those patients, 46.4% were sufficiently treated. LF was carried out in 54 cases (either after CD, or after DI, or primarily). Of those patients, 98.1% were treated sufficiently. LF had a statistically significant higher success rate compared to CD and DI (P<0.001 respectively). Conclusions: The study confirmed the significance of SLC as a common complication after RARP. LF turned out to be the most effective treatment option for SLC, while CD as well as DI have not been proven effective.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | PELVIC LYMPHADENECTOMY; CATHETER DRAINAGE; COMPLICATIONS; Prostate cancer; lymphocele; robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP); laparoscopic fenestration; complication |
| Subjects: | 600 Technology > 610 Medical sciences Medicine |
| Divisions: | Medicine > Lehrstuhl für Urologie |
| Depositing User: | Dr. Gernot Deinzer |
| Date Deposited: | 24 Aug 2022 13:59 |
| Last Modified: | 24 Aug 2022 13:59 |
| URI: | https://pred.uni-regensburg.de/id/eprint/46381 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
