Avascular necrosis of the femoral head: three-dimensional measurement of drilling precision reveals high accuracy and no difference between fluoroscopically controlled core decompression and cancellous bone grafting

Woerner, Michael and Voelkl, Korbinian and Ferner, Felix and Weber, Markus and Renkawitz, Tobias and Grifka, Joachim and Craiovan, Benjamin (2023) Avascular necrosis of the femoral head: three-dimensional measurement of drilling precision reveals high accuracy and no difference between fluoroscopically controlled core decompression and cancellous bone grafting. ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 143. pp. 4713-4719. ISSN 0936-8051, 1434-3916

Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)

Abstract

IntroductionAvascular osteonecrosis of the femoral head (AVN) is a widespread disease affecting mostly young and active people, often exacerbating in progressive stages, ending in joint replacement. The most common joint preserving operative therapy for early stages is core decompression (CD), optional with cancellous bone grafting (CBG). For success it is vital that the necrotic area is hit and the sclerotic rim is broken by drilling into the defect zone to relieve intraosseous pressure. The aim of this study was to investigate if both techniques are precise enough to hit the center of the necrosis and if there is a difference in precision between drilling with small pins (CD) and the trephine (CBG).Patients and methods10 patients underwent CD, 12 patients CBG with conventional C-arm imaging. Postoperatively 3D MRI reconstructions of the necrotic area and the drilling channels were compared. The deviation of the drilling channel from the center of the necrotic area was measured. PROMs (HHS, HOOS, EQ-5D, SF-36) were evaluated to compare the clinical success of these procedures.ResultsNeither with CD nor with CBG the defect zone was missed. The drilling precision of both procedures did not differ significantly: distance to center 3.58 mm for CD (range 0.0-14.06, SD 4.2) versus 3.91 mm for CBG (range 0.0-15.27, SD 4.7). PROMs showed no significant difference.ConclusionConcerning the most important difference between the two procedures-the surgical higher demanding technique of CBG-we suggest applying the less invasive technique of CD alone.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: MARROW EDEMA SYNDROME; INDUCED ADIPOGENESIS; OSTEONECROSIS; MANAGEMENT; HIP; MECHANISM; CELLS; Hip joint; Femoral head necrosis; Bone graft; Core decompression; Bone drilling; Precision
Subjects: 600 Technology > 610 Medical sciences Medicine
Divisions: Medicine > Lehrstuhl für Orthopädie
Depositing User: Dr. Gernot Deinzer
Date Deposited: 07 May 2024 05:08
Last Modified: 07 May 2024 05:08
URI: https://pred.uni-regensburg.de/id/eprint/60229

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item