Complete lymph node dissection in cutaneous melanoma patients with positive sentinel lymph node: Outcome and predictors in a retrospective cohort study over 16 years

Baecher, Helena and Gerken, Michael and Knoedler, Leonard and Knoedler, Samuel and Alfertshofer, Michael and -Schalke, Monika Klinkhammer and Berneburg, Mark and Drexler, Konstantin and Haferkamp, Sebastian (2024) Complete lymph node dissection in cutaneous melanoma patients with positive sentinel lymph node: Outcome and predictors in a retrospective cohort study over 16 years. JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 92. pp. 33-47. ISSN 1748-6815, 1878-0539

Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)

Abstract

Background: In melanoma treatment, complete lymph node dissection (CLND) has been considered the therapeutic gold standard in patients with positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). This long -held approach was revised in 2017, with recent evidence questioning the therapeutic benefit of CLND in malignant melanoma (MM) therapy. In this study, we aimed to fill this knowledge gap by retrospectively analyzing the impact of CLND on MM patients' survival. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the multi -center population -based Clinical Cancer Registry at the Tumor Center Regensburg (TUDOK) database (2004-2020) to identify patients who had been diagnosed with SLN-positive MM and underwent (non)invasive man- agement thereof. Patient cohorts were subdivided according to the treatment received (CLND and waiving CLND). Primary outcomes included overall survival (OS), recurrence -free survival (RFS), and cumulative recurrence rate. Results: We identified 1143 MM patients, of whom 126 (11.0%) had positive SLN status. CLND was waived in the majority of SLN-positive MM cases (n = 71; 56.3%), with 55 (43.7%) patients undergoing CLND. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression revealed no significant advantage for CLND patients compared to non-CLND patients in OS (HR=0.970, p = 0.915 and HR=1.295, p = 0.479, respectively), RFS (HR=1.050, p = 0.849 and HR=1.220, p = 0.544, respectively), and cumulative recurrence rate (HR=1.234, p = 0.441 and HR=1.220, p = 0.544), respectively). Conclusion: We found that CLND had no significant impact on patient survival and MM recurrence rate, thus corroborating the validity of current clinical guidelines. (c) 2024 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creative- commons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: SURVIVAL-PATTERNS; TUMOR BURDEN; RISK-FACTORS; BIOPSY; MULTICENTER; HEAD; LYMPHADENECTOMY; METASTASIS; MORBIDITY; Melanoma; Sentinel lymph node; Complete lymph node dissection; Recurrence; Recurrence-free; survival
Subjects: 600 Technology > 610 Medical sciences Medicine
Divisions: Medicine > Lehrstuhl für Dermatologie und Venerologie
Medicine > Zentren des Universitätsklinikums Regensburg > Tumorzentrum e.V.
Medicine > Zentren des Universitätsklinikums Regensburg > Zentrum für Plastische-, Hand- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie
Depositing User: Dr. Gernot Deinzer
Date Deposited: 28 Jul 2025 11:03
Last Modified: 28 Jul 2025 11:03
URI: https://pred.uni-regensburg.de/id/eprint/63846

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item